<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Commentaires sur : “Is a good sketch better than a long speech?”	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.science-climat-energie.be/2022/12/16/is-a-good-sketch-better-than-a-long-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.science-climat-energie.be/2022/12/16/is-a-good-sketch-better-than-a-long-speech/</link>
	<description>Réflexions sur la science, le climat et l&#039;énergie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 18:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Par : Marisela Lebarron		</title>
		<link>https://www.science-climat-energie.be/2022/12/16/is-a-good-sketch-better-than-a-long-speech/#comment-23255</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marisela Lebarron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2023 18:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.science-climat-energie.be/?p=20019#comment-23255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ce texte est un très bon exemple de recherche totale et d&#039;analyse prudente.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ce texte est un très bon exemple de recherche totale et d&rsquo;analyse prudente.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Par : Emmanuel Simon		</title>
		<link>https://www.science-climat-energie.be/2022/12/16/is-a-good-sketch-better-than-a-long-speech/#comment-18839</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emmanuel Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2022 23:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.science-climat-energie.be/?p=20019#comment-18839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Anton 17-12  10:46 : 
Which are the most serious analysis of FACTS in here ? 

Far from scientific exchanges, all the COP27 meetings among world leaders are just DIPLOMATIC habits... side by side with contests from a huge bunch of ideologists and NGO activists !

All BRICS countries – wherein most attendees don&#039;t believe in COPs spéculatives findings – remain determined to meet their essential needs and conduct their own axis for their national population development and well being. Means billions of terrestrial lifes ! There, diplomacy has one key mission : defend national stakes and interests ! 

Does the « United Nations » truly respond these key, vital factors ? In search of a true answer, let&#039;s observe the sad realities across the world... and most ineffective bureaucracies !
It&#039;s clear that COPs objectives target only ONE request : dump billions ($ 100 bn/year) from developed countries down to those who claim CO2 is adverse to their survival... 

Let&#039;s recognize this article from author Christian Seyve is very original !
For the first time, one tries to correlate public FACTS throughout these educational maps. Facts of life, right ?

Dear Anton : Comments after comments, whatever the subjects developped on this S-C-E site, you never contribute but object and oppose ! Where does remain your open mind ?

Sincerely, from another accasional author]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anton 17-12  10:46 :<br />
Which are the most serious analysis of FACTS in here ? </p>
<p>Far from scientific exchanges, all the COP27 meetings among world leaders are just DIPLOMATIC habits&#8230; side by side with contests from a huge bunch of ideologists and NGO activists !</p>
<p>All BRICS countries – wherein most attendees don&rsquo;t believe in COPs spéculatives findings – remain determined to meet their essential needs and conduct their own axis for their national population development and well being. Means billions of terrestrial lifes ! There, diplomacy has one key mission : defend national stakes and interests ! </p>
<p>Does the « United Nations » truly respond these key, vital factors ? In search of a true answer, let&rsquo;s observe the sad realities across the world&#8230; and most ineffective bureaucracies !<br />
It&rsquo;s clear that COPs objectives target only ONE request : dump billions ($ 100 bn/year) from developed countries down to those who claim CO2 is adverse to their survival&#8230; </p>
<p>Let&rsquo;s recognize this article from author Christian Seyve is very original !<br />
For the first time, one tries to correlate public FACTS throughout these educational maps. Facts of life, right ?</p>
<p>Dear Anton : Comments after comments, whatever the subjects developped on this S-C-E site, you never contribute but object and oppose ! Where does remain your open mind ?</p>
<p>Sincerely, from another accasional author</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Par : Anton		</title>
		<link>https://www.science-climat-energie.be/2022/12/16/is-a-good-sketch-better-than-a-long-speech/#comment-18768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 09:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.science-climat-energie.be/?p=20019#comment-18768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You could use the same argument to say that France hasn&#039;t participated in the Fifa World Cup in Qatar because Emmanuel Macron hasn&#039;t been present at the opening ceremony.

The US, China, India, and almost all other UNFCCC signatory countries have been very present at the COP. Media are full of reports about a meeting between the US and Chinese delegations at the COP, for example. Give us a break, be serious for a second. Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could use the same argument to say that France hasn&rsquo;t participated in the Fifa World Cup in Qatar because Emmanuel Macron hasn&rsquo;t been present at the opening ceremony.</p>
<p>The US, China, India, and almost all other UNFCCC signatory countries have been very present at the COP. Media are full of reports about a meeting between the US and Chinese delegations at the COP, for example. Give us a break, be serious for a second. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
